(PC) Harding v. Correctional Health Services

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRENT LEE HARDING, No. 2:21-cv-0922 KJM SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a former county jail inmate currently confined in state prison, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”), and has requested appointment of counsel. On September 20, 2024, the district judge declined to adopt findings and recommendations by the magistrate judge previously assigned to this case to revoke plaintiff’s IFP status (the “September 20 Order”). (See ECF Nos. 23, 40.) The district judge referred the matter back to the undersigned for further pretrial proceedings consistent with the September 20 Order. IFP Matters Pursuant to the September 20 Order, defendant Mencias’ motion to revoke IFP status is denied and plaintiff continues under the IFP status previously granted in this case. (See ECF No. 6.) The operative first amended complaint has been screened as required by the IFP…