(PC) Calloway v. Naphcare Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY, No. 2:24-cv-2446 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER NAPHCARE INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil action. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On September 19, 2024, the court recommended that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied as plaintiff has “struck out” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and, in his complaint, plaintiff does not allege he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. Plaintiff has now paid the filing fee for this action. Accordingly, plaintiff’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied as moot and the court will vacate the September 19, 2024, findings and recommendations. 1. Screening The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee…