(SS) Holmes v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20241:23-cv-01279California459 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHRYSTAL HOLMES, Case No. 1:23-cv-1279-WBS-SKO

Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING

v. THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED

MARTIN O’MALLEY, AND THE ACTION BE REMANDED TO

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER

SECURITY, PROCEEDINGS 15 Defendant. (Doc. 26) 17 18 Plaintiff Chrystal Holmes seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for benefits. (Docs. 1, 12). The magistrate judge found the ALJ erred by failing to provide clear and convincing reasons to discount Plaintiff’s subjective complaints. (Doc. 26 at 12). Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended Plaintiff’s motion for judgment be granted and the matter be remanded for further administrative proceedings. (Id. at 15-16). In addition, the magistrate judge recommended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.