(PS) Hedrington v. David Grant Medical Center

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

ORLONZO HEDRINGTON, No. 2:23-cv-00801-TLN-CKD

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

DAVID GRANT MEDICAL CENTER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Orlonzo Hedrington’s (“Plaintiff”) 18 Motions for Relief from Judgment and Motion to Set Aside Judgment. (ECF Nos. 64, 67, 73, 19 77). Defendants David Grant Medical Center (“DGMC”) and Fairfield Police Department (collectively, “Defendants”) did not file an opposition. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motions. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 As discussed below, the Court construes Plaintiff’s motion to set aside Judgment as a motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 60(b). A detailed recitation of the factual and procedural history is not necessary for the disposition of Plaintiff’s motions. In short, Plaintiff commenced this civil rights action against Defendants, seeking relief under 42 U.S.C.…