Ayodele

Smith v. Ayodele

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20241:24-cv-01100California2,317 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CANDACE SMITH, No. 1:24-cv-01100-JLT-SKO

Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: SEYI AYODELE, (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;

(2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE Defendant. WISHES TO STAND ON HER COMPLAINT; OR

(3) FILE A NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL

18 (Doc. 3)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

21 22 Plaintiff Candace Smith, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint on September 16, 2024. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff filed a document titled “First Amended Complaint” (Doc. 3) on September 17, 2024, which the Court interprets as a supplement to Plaintiff’s initial complaint. Upon reviewing the complaint, the Court concludes that it fails to state any cognizable claims. Plaintiff has the following options as to how to proceed. She may file an amended 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.