CDCR
(PC) Garland v. CDCR
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUN DARNELL GARLAND, No. 2:23-cv-00418-SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Shaun Darnell Garland, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis. This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff initiated this action on March 6, 2023, and on February 23, 2024 filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) which is before the court for screening. (ECF No. 16.) Having reviewed this matter, the undersigned finds plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should be revoked. Plaintiff accrued three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) prior to filing this action, does not meet the imminent danger exception, and should be ordered to pay the $405 filing fee to proceed with this case. I. In Forma Pauperis Statute The Prison Litigation Reform Act…