CDCR

(PC) Garland v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20242:23-cv-00418California1,728 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUN DARNELL GARLAND, No. 2:23-cv-00418-SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Shaun Darnell Garland, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis. This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff initiated this action on March 6, 2023, and on February 23, 2024 filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) which is before the court for screening. (ECF No. 16.) Having reviewed this matter, the undersigned finds plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should be revoked. Plaintiff accrued three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) prior to filing this action, does not meet the imminent danger exception, and should be ordered to pay the $405 filing fee to proceed with this case. I. In Forma Pauperis Statute The Prison Litigation Reform Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.