(PC) Taylor v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20242:24-cv-00773California1,390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR, No. 2:24-cv-0773 WBS SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CA, et al., Defendant. 17 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action on March 8, 2024 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that he was tackled to the ground and arrested in the “Winter 2017 at/around 10:00 pm on a Sat” because he was holding a sign saying “Barnes and Noble is racist.” (See Docket No. 2 at 5.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. In an Order filed and served upon plaintiff on June 20, 2024, the originally assigned Magistrate Judge, pursuant to her duty to screen prisoner complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1951A(a), explained that plaintiff’s claims appeared to be barred by California’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.