(PS) Narayan v. USAA Ins. Co.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRAKASH NARAYAN, No. 2:24-cv-2256-WBS-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER v. USAA INSURANCE CO., et al. Defendants. 16 On August 27, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 4), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On September 10, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion for an additional 45 days to file objections. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff states he needs more time to compile a record from state court, asserting he intends to provide records “back to 1998 from State court and this court past 5 years.” (Id.) Defendants opposed additional time, noting Plaintiff provided no legal basis for the additional time and noting his vexatious litigant status in state court. (ECF No. 6.) The magistrate judge denied Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file objections for lack of good cause. (ECF No. 7.) This court 26 …