White

White v. Conduent Commercial Solutions, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20241:23-cv-00113California11,056 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLENE WHITE, ) Case No.: 1:23-cv-00113 JLT CDB ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ) MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION v. ) ) (Doc. 5) CONDUENT COMMERCIAL SOLUTIONS, )

LLC, )

) ) Defendant. ) ) 17 Charlene White, a former employee of Conduent Commercial Solutions, LLC, alleges that CCS engaged in discriminatory and retaliatory conduct in connection with her employment. (See Doc. 1-1 at 3-17 (“Complaint”).) She seeks to hold CCS liable under California law, namely California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act. (Id.) CCS removed this action from Kern County Superior Court and now seeks to compel arbitration, asserting that White agreed to arbitrate claims arising out of her employment. (Docs. 1, 5.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED. I. Background and Allegations CCS is a wholly owned subsidiary of Conduent Business…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.