Marzan

(PC) Kendrid v. Marzan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20242:22-cv-02301California744 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FORREST KENDRID, No. 2:22-cv-2301 TLN CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARZAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former civil detainee, proceeding without counsel, with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 10, 2024, this Court ordered plaintiff to show cause within thirty days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 38.) For the following reasons, the September 10, 2024 order to show cause is discharged, and plaintiff is ordered to file a status report within thirty days. On June 27, 2024, this Court issued a further scheduling order setting the pretrial conference for December 3, 2024. (ECF No. 36.) Plaintiff’s pretrial statement is due on or before November 12, 2024. (Id.) Defendants’ pretrial statement is due on or before November 26, 2024. (Id.) On July 8, 2024, the June 27, 2024 further scheduling order was returned, marked “unclaimed.” …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.