(PC) Stolze v. Tuolumne County Jail
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I. BACKGROUND
25 Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on June 4, 2024. (ECF No. 1). On 26 July 12, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it failed to state any 27 cognizable claims, in part because “Plaintiff has not named any defendant, and asserts more 28 than 20 unrelated issues.” (ECF No. 9 at 6). The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days to either “file an amended complaint . . . or file a statement with the Court that she wants to stand on [original] complaint . . .” (Id. at 1–2). Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint (FAC) on July 29, 2024. (ECF No. 10). Plaintiff again alleged problems with food and showers at Tuolumne County Jail, but had significantly narrowed down the list of issues she raised. The Court screened her amended complaint and on August 19, 2024, issued a second screening order holding that Plaintiff again failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 11). The Court gave Plaintiff 30 days to either file a second amended complaint or file a statement with the Court that she wants to stand on her first amended complaint. (Id. at 8). The Court advised Plaintiff that, if she…