(PS) Gilbert v. Clear Recon Corp

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20242:24-cv-02308California1,559 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL EDWARD GILBERT, No. 2:24-cv-02308-DAD-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER CLEAR RECON CORP., et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Paul Edward Gilbert initiated this action on August 26, 2024, with a fee-paid complaint naming several defendants and bringing claims arising out of an alleged wrongful foreclosure. Because plaintiff proceeds without counsel, this matter is referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Presently before the court is plaintiff’s ex parte motion for leave to record a lis pendens on the property at 11782 Blackberry Place in Nevada City, California. (ECF No. 6.) This matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). “A party to an action who asserts a real property claim may record a notice of pendency of action in which that real property claim is alleged.” Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 405.20. This is known as lis pendens. See Kirkeby v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.