Sanderlin
Sanderlin v. Walmart Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EMILY SANDERLIN, Case No. 1:24-cv-00971-JLT-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET
v. TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
WALMART, INC., (ECF No. 44) Defendant.
16 On April 2, 2024, this action was filed in the District of South Carolina. (ECF No. 1.) On August 20, 2024, the matter was transferred to the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 29.) On August 23, 2024, an order was filed relating this action to Navarro v. Target Corp., No. 1:24-cv-00280-JLT-SAB, and the matter was reassigned. (ECF No. 32.) On October 22, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 44.) “[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), ‘a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.’ ” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v.…