Jackson v. City of Stockton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20242:24-cv-01219California2,546 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1|ipoRTER ScoTT |] APROFESSIONAL CORPORATION William E. Camy, SBN 291397 3 || Jennifer L. Thompson, SBN 337107 2180 Harvard Street, Suite 500 Sacramento, CA 95815 TEL: 916.929.1481

FAX: 916.927.3706

wcamy @ porterscott.com jthompson @ porterscott.com Attorneys for Defendants Exempt from filing fee pursuant to Government Code section 6103 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 i DARRYL JACKSON, an individual, Case No.: 2:24-cv-01219-JDP Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER A fPROPOSED} ORDER 13 CITY OF STOCKTON, a municipal corporation; || ANTHONY PERRY, individually and in his official capacity as an officer for the Stockton 16 || Police Department; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, individually, jointly, and severally, Defendants. / Complaint Filed: 04/29/24 19 Plaintiff DARRYL JACKSON (‘Plaintiff’), Defendant ANTHONY PERRY (“Defendant”), and 21 || Third Party CITY OF STOCKTON, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and in good 22 || faith believe that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.