(PC) Kambon v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20242:23-cv-01765California850 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THEON KAMBON, No. 2:23-CV-1765-DJC-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 24, of the Court's January 31, 2024, order denying entry of default and the Court's May 14, 2024, order denying the appointment of counsel. The Court may grant reconsideration under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60. Generally, a motion for reconsideration of a final judgment is appropriately brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See Backlund v. Barnhart, 778 F.2d 1386, 1388 (9th Cir. 1985) (discussing reconsideration of summary judgment); see also Schroeder v. McDonald, 55 F.3d 454, 458-59 (9th Cir. 1995). Under Rule 60(a), the Court may grant reconsideration of final…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.