Quiring

(PC) Jones v. Quiring

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20242:24-cv-01933California1,019 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYON JONES, Case No. 2:24-cv-01933-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER: v. (1) FINDING THAT THE COMPLAINT

STATES A COGNIZABLE

J. QUIRING, et al., FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT DUE

PROCESS CLAIM AGAINST

Defendants. DEFENDANT QUIRING (2) DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

INDICATE WHETHER HE WISHES TO

PROCEED WITH CLAIMS DEEMED

COGNIZABLE IN THIS ORDER OR

DELAY SERVICE AND FILE

ANOTHER AMENDED COMPLAINT

19 (3) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND MOTION TO

AMEND COMPLAINT ECF Nos. 2, 5, & 6 23 24 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, alleges that defendant Quiring violated his due process rights by refusing to allow him to call a witness at a disciplinary hearing at which he was found guilty. 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.