Quiring
(PC) Jones v. Quiring
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20242:24-cv-01933California1,019 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYON JONES, Case No. 2:24-cv-01933-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER: v. (1) FINDING THAT THE COMPLAINT
STATES A COGNIZABLE
J. QUIRING, et al., FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT DUE
PROCESS CLAIM AGAINST
Defendants. DEFENDANT QUIRING (2) DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
INDICATE WHETHER HE WISHES TO
PROCEED WITH CLAIMS DEEMED
COGNIZABLE IN THIS ORDER OR
DELAY SERVICE AND FILE
ANOTHER AMENDED COMPLAINT
19 (3) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS AND MOTION TO
AMEND COMPLAINT ECF Nos. 2, 5, & 6 23 24 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, alleges that defendant Quiring violated his due process rights by refusing to allow him to call a witness at a disciplinary hearing at which he was found guilty. 27…