Dunn

Dunn v. HUD Urban Development

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20241:24-cv-00815California1,042 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EMMA DUNN, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00815-KES-BAM

Plaintiffs,

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS EMMA

v. DUNN AND ALANA DUNN TO FILE A

SIGNED COMPLAINT

HUD URBAN DEVELOPMENT, et al.,

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS EMMA

Defendants. DUNN AND ALANA DUNN TO FILE LONG

FORM APPLICATIONS TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE THIRTY DAY (30) DAY DEADLINE 14 On July 16, 2024, Emma Dunn, Ariel Dunn, Richie Dunn, Aaliyah Dunn, and Ashanti 15 Dunn (“Plaintiffs”) filed the instant civil action. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff Emma Dunn also filed an 16 application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2.) On July 22, 2024, the Court reviewed these 17 filings, identified various deficiencies, and ordered as follows: (1) if Plaintiffs Ariel Dunn, Richie 18 Dunn, Aaliyah Dunn, and Ashanti Dunn wish to proceed in this action along with Plaintiff Emma 19 Dunn, then they shall file an amended complaint that includes the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.