Schuyler

(HC) King v. Schuyler

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20242:23-cv-02360California563 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Jesse Stephen King, No. 2:23-cv-02360-KJM-SCR Petitioner, ORDER v. Charles Schuyler, 1S Respondent. 16 Petitioner Jesse Stephen King has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The case was referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge under this District’s Local Rules. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(17). In March 2024, the Magistrate Judge issued an order 20 (1) instructing petitioner to pay the filing fee or submit a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, (2) denying petitioner’s request for a transfer to a court in San Diego 22 and (3) dismissing the petition with leave to amend for failure to comply with Rule 2 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. See generally Order (Mar. 8, 2024), ECF No. 13. Petitioner has 24 since filed several “objections” to that order. See ECF Nos. 15-17. The court construes these 25 objections as motions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.