Warden

(HC) Iseli v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20242:24-cv-01934California397 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON WILLIE ISELI, No. 2:24-cv-01934 KJM AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 19, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 4. Petitioner filed a response to the findings and recommendations and requested the matter be transferred to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for authorization to proceed with a second or successive application for habeas relief. See ECF No. 6. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.