Senator

Senator v. Macomber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20241:24-cv-00439California462 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRUCE RICHARD SENATOR, Case No. 1:24-cv-00439-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE

v. DOCUMENTS VIA CM/ECF

JEFF MACOMBER, et al., (ECF No. 8)

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Bruce Richard Senator (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights action on April 12, 2024, along with a motion to file and serve electronically and appear remotely at hearings. (ECF Nos. 1, 4.) On September 9, 2024, Plaintiff’s motion to file and served electronically was denied and the motion to appear remotely at hearings was granted. (ECF No. 6.) On October 3, 2024, Plaintiff filed a second motion to file electronically via CM/ECF. (ECF No. 8.) Pursuant to the Local Rules, a pro se party must file and serve paper documents. L.R. 133(a). Persons appearing pro se are specifically prohibited from utilizing electronic filing “except with the permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge.” L.R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.