(PC) James v. Sacramento County Sheriff Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20242:23-cv-00853California479 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD EUGENE JAMES, No. 2:23-CV-0853-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to disqualify the undersigned and for a change of venue. See ECF No. 15. Plaintiff’s motion is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 144, which provides as follows:

Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in favor of any adverse party, such judge shall proceed no further therein, but another judge shall be assigned to hear such proceeding. Berger v. United States, 255 U.S. 22 (1922), is the primary case interpreting § 144. See U.S. v. Azhocar, 581 F.2d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.