Davis

(PC) Rushdan v. Davis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20242:24-cv-02064California659 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SALADIN RUSHDAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-02064-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO

ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS

D. DAVIS, et al., CASE Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE

DENIED AND HE BE DIRECTED TO PAY

THE FILING FEE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

OF ANY ORDER ADOPTING THESE

RECOMMENDATIONS

19 ECF No. 2 20 Plaintiff has filed a complaint, ECF No. 1, and a request to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. He is, however, a “three-striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). He has filed three cases that have been dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has had at least three cases dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted: (1) Rushdan v. Gear, No. 1:16-cv-01017-LJO-BAM…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.