Steinhauer

Pacific Boat Services, Inc. v. Steinhauer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20242:24-cv-01036California2,577 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PACIFIC BOAT SERVICES, INC., Case No. 2:24-cv-1036-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER TAKING JUDICIAL NOTICE OF

DOCUMENTS AND DISMISSING

TIMOTHY STEINHAUER, et al., PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 13, 14) 16 Plaintiff Pacific Boat Services, Inc. maintains California state law claims against Defendants Timothy and Julie Steinhauer concerning Defendants’ boat.1 (ECF No. 1-1). The Steinhauers assert Pacific Boat’s claims arise out of the same facts as claims asserted in Steinhauer v. Pacific Boat Services, Inc., 2:23-cv-0738-JAM-AC (E.D. Cal.) (the “2023 Action”). The Steinhauers move to dismiss this case, arguing Pacific Boat was required to raise any compulsory counterclaims in the 2023 Action. (ECF No. 13.) The Steinhauers also request that the Court take judicial notice of filings in the 2023 Action. (ECF No. 14.) Pacific Boat did not respond to the Steinhauers’ motion or request. The Court takes judicial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.