Schuyler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONOVAN CHAD BREVIK, No. 2:23-cv-01639-KJM-EFB (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER CHARLES SCHUYLER, Respondent. 16 Petitioner proceeds without counsel in this petition for writ of habeas under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 5, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 6. Neither party has filed objections. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the…