Beyard
Beyard v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20241:21-cv-01063California9,030 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PANGNHIA VUE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01063-JLT-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE CLASS
v. REPRESENTATIVES AND GRANTING IN
PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
PENTAGON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, SANCTIONS AND VACATING OCTOBER 9, 2024 HEARING Defendant. (ECF Nos. 50-53, 55, 56, 58-61, 64-65)
FIVE DAY DEADLINE
17 Currently before the Court are Pangnhia Vue’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to substitute class representatives and Pentagon Federal Credit Union’s (“Defendant” or “the Credit Union”) motion for sanctions. The Court, having reviewed the record, finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). Accordingly, the previously scheduled hearing set on October 9, 2024, will be vacated and the parties will not be required to appear at that time. I. BACKGROUND The Credit Union is engaged in providing banking services to…