Beyard

Beyard v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20241:21-cv-01063California9,030 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PANGNHIA VUE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01063-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE CLASS

v. REPRESENTATIVES AND GRANTING IN

PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

PENTAGON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, SANCTIONS AND VACATING OCTOBER 9, 2024 HEARING Defendant. (ECF Nos. 50-53, 55, 56, 58-61, 64-65)

FIVE DAY DEADLINE

17 Currently before the Court are Pangnhia Vue’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to substitute class representatives and Pentagon Federal Credit Union’s (“Defendant” or “the Credit Union”) motion for sanctions. The Court, having reviewed the record, finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). Accordingly, the previously scheduled hearing set on October 9, 2024, will be vacated and the parties will not be required to appear at that time. I. BACKGROUND The Credit Union is engaged in providing banking services to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.