Espinoza
Espinoza v. Guardian Industries, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 9 FRANK ESPINOZA, C ase No. 1:24-cv-00853-KES-SAB Plaintiff, S CHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P 16) P h Ina is te iad l D Di is sc co lov se ur ry e sa :n Sd e pM teo mtio bn er D 1e 8a ,d 2l 0in 2e 4s : v. A Prm e-e Cn ed rm tife in ct as t it oo n t h Ne o P nl -e Ea xd pin eg rts D: O iscc oto vb ee ryr : 8, 2024 GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES, LLC, C eN rto iv fie cm atb ioe nr M7, o 2 t0 io2 n5 Filing: January 23, 2026 Opposition and Reply: By Local Rule & Stipulation 15 Defendant. 16 I. Date of Scheduling Conference The Scheduling Conference was held via videoconference on October 3, 2024. II. Appearances of Counsel Taylor Gee and Nathan Reese appeared via video on behalf of Plaintiff. Amy Choe appeared via video on behalf of Defendant. III. Consent to Magistrate Judge The parties have not consented to magistrate jurisdiction. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to the parties who have not…