Amaro

Amaro v. Bee Sweet Citrus, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20241:21-cv-00382California5,466 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAFAEL MARQUEZ AMARO, JAVIER Case No. 1:21-cv-00382-JLT-EPG BARRERA, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR IN

Plaintiffs, THE ALTERNATIVE TOTAL OR PARTIAL

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. (Docs. 33, 40) BEE SWEET CITRUS, INC., and DOES 1 through 10, 16 Defendants, ___________________________________

BEE SWEET CITRUS, INC.,

Counter-Complainant,

v.

RAFAEL MARQUEZ AMARO, JAVIER BARRERA, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated,

Counter-Defendants.

24 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are Bee Sweet Citrus, Inc.’s motions for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(c), or in the alternative, motion for summary judgment under Rule 56(a). (Docs. 33, 40.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court strikes Bee Sweet’s first motion, (Doc. 33), and denies Bee Sweet’s second motion, (Doc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.