Leikauf

(PC) Hill v. Leikauf

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20242:23-cv-01593California2,983 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL ALAN HILL, No. 2:23-cv-01593 AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEFF LEIKAUF, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county inmate who filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without a lawyer. He has requested leave to proceed without paying the full filing fee for this action based on 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration showing that he cannot afford to pay the entire filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.1 I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against “a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). A

This means that plaintiff is allowed to pay the $350.00 filing fee in monthly installments that are taken from the inmate’s trust account rather than in one lump…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.