(PS) Toepfer v. City of Vallejo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20242:24-cv-02366California5,381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT TOEPFER, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-02366-KJM-CSK Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING IFP REQUESTS AS

MOOT, AND FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING

PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE MOTION FOR

CITY OF VALLEJO, et al., TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH

Defendants. LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF Nos. 2, 3, 18) 17 Plaintiffs Robert Toepfer, Shawn O’Malley, Joan Alford, James Nelson, Pam Nelson, Cassandra Salinas, and Michael L. Mardell bring this action in pro per against Defendants City of Vallejo, the Vallejo Police Department, Vallejo City Manager Andrew Murray, CalTrans, Solano County Sheriff Deputy Dale Matsuoka, Assistant to the Vallejo City Manager Natalie Peterson, and Golden Bay Security Services. See Compl. (ECF No. 1.)1 Plaintiffs are unhoused individuals in Vallejo, California who challenge their upcoming removal from an encampment by Defendants. Pending before the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.