(PC)Frye
(PC)Frye v. Pfiefer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JHONATHAN FRYE, Case No.: 1:21-cv-01525-KES-SKO (PC) Plaintiff,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
v. DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
PFIEFER, Warden, et al., CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE
GRANTED
Defendants. (Doc. 15) 16 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 17 Plaintiff Jhonathan Frye is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 I. INTRODUCTION This Court issued its First Screening Order on January 26, 2023, finding Plaintiff stated cognizable claims of threat to safety in violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Vasquez and Rodriguez, but failed to state any other cognizable claim against any named defendant. (Doc. 9.) On February 9, 2023, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (Doc. 10.) The Court issued its Second Screening Order on October 27, 2023. (Doc. 11.) The Court determined Plaintiff’s first amended…