(PC)Sandoval
(PC)Sandoval v. Lopez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIO SANDOVAL, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00248 JLT SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION AND
v. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
M. LOPEZ, et al., (Docs. 33, 34, 35)
Defendants. ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR THE
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
Plaintiff Julio Sandoval is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims and failure to protect/threat to safety claims against Defendants Andrade, Cerillo, Felix, Lopez, Miguel, Perez, and William. I. INTRODUCTION On May 29, 2024, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s first amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 24.) On June 12, 2024, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Request for extension of time to submit…