(PC)Sandoval

(PC)Sandoval v. Lopez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20241:23-cv-00248California2,785 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIO SANDOVAL, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00248 JLT SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION AND

v. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

M. LOPEZ, et al., (Docs. 33, 34, 35)

Defendants. ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR THE

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Plaintiff Julio Sandoval is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims and failure to protect/threat to safety claims against Defendants Andrade, Cerillo, Felix, Lopez, Miguel, Perez, and William. I. INTRODUCTION On May 29, 2024, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s first amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 24.) On June 12, 2024, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Request for extension of time to submit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.