Acevedo
Acevedo v. Akari
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CESAR ACEVEDO, Case No. 1:24-cv-01199-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL
v. JURISDICTION RASEM A. AKARI, et al., Deadline: October 22, 2024 Defendants. 16 On October 4, 2024, Plaintiff Cesar Acevedo initiated this action against Defendants Rasem A. Akari, doing business as Mountain View Mart, and Manhal Khalil (“Defendants”). (Doc. 1). Plaintiff’s complaint asserts claims for injunctive relief under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), violation of California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), violation of California Disabled Persons Act, and related state law causes of action. Id. Based upon the Court of Appeals’ opinion in Vo v. Choi, this Court will order Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s Unruh Act claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); Vo v. Choi, 49 F.4th…