Wright

(PC) Graham v. Wright

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20241:22-cv-00504California1,702 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAPHAEL GRAHAM, Case No. 1:22-cv-00504-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

v.

ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE

WRIGHT, TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO OBEY

COURT ORDER

Defendant. (ECF No. 45)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Raphael Graham (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendant Wright (“Defendant”) for violation of the Fourth Amendment for conducting the second strip search with an activated body camera, exposing Plaintiff’s genitals on camera, and for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends that this action be dismissed, with prejudice. I. Background On April 15, 2024, Defendant filed a notice of request to seal documents pursuant to Local Rule 141,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.