O'Brien

(PC) Dilnessa v. O'Brien

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20242:24-cv-00271California878 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AYALNEH DILNESSA, Case No. 2:24-cv-00271-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. THAT THE CLERK OF COURT

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

KELLY S. O’BRIEN, et al., TO THIS MATTER Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THIS MATTER BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

19 On March 15, 2024, the court granted plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 16. Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint or otherwise to respond to the court order. Therefore, on July 11, 2024, I ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. ECF No. 17. Plaintiff has not responded to the order to show cause, and the time to do so has passed. 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.