(PC) Rojo v. Amador Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20242:22-cv-02137California992 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUIS ALBERTO MEZA ROJO, Case No. 2:22-cv-02137-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO RESPOND TO

AMADOR JAIL, et al., COURT ORDERS Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

17 This matter settled on April 23, 2024, after the parties participated in a settlement 18 conference with Judge Cota. ECF No. 28. Pursuant to the settlement, Judge Cota ordered the 19 parties to submit a signed stipulation for voluntary dismissal within thirty days. Id. On May 23, 20 2024, defendant filed a status report indicating that he mailed plaintiff (1) a copy of the stipulated 21 dismissal for signature, (2) a self-addressed stamp envelope, (3) a copy of the court’s minute 22 order, and (4) a cover letter to plaintiff requesting that he sign and mail the stipulation for 23 voluntary dismissal back to defendant in the self-addressed stamped envelope provided. ECF No. 24 29. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.