Batra

(PC) Ward v. Batra

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20241:21-cv-00929California3,281 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD WILLIAM WARD, Case No. 1:21-cv-00929-KES-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS FOLLOWING

v.

SCREENING

S. BATRA, et al., (Doc. 31) Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Plaintiff Ronald William Ward is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. BACKGROUND On November 14, 2023, after screening Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, the Court issued “Findings and Recommendations to Dismiss this Action for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted.” (Doc. 27.) Following objections by Plaintiff in which he apologized “for his errors in following” instructions, the Court issued its “Order Vacating Findings and Recommendations to Dismiss for a Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted; Order Directing Clerk of the Court to File Third Amended Complaint.” (Doc. 30.) The Court now…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.