(PC) Anderson v. Solano County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20242:23-cv-03002California885 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLEN MACK ANDERSON, No. 2:23-cv-3002 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SOLANO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 3, 2024, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court found that plaintiff could proceed on the following claims: 1. A claim for excessive use of force arising under the Fourteenth Amendment against defendant Sgt. Kamman with respect to an incident occurring November 15, 2023. ECF No. 1 at 3. 2. A claim for denial of adequate medical care against defendants Solano County and Wellpath Medical arising under the Fourteenth Amendment and Monell v. Dep’t of Social 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.