Cittadino

Cittadino v. BrandSafway Services, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20242:23-cv-00322California555 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 SULLIVAN CITTADINO, an No. 2:23-cv-00322 WBS JDP individual, 13 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

BRANDSAFWAY SERVICES, LLC;

BRAND INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.;

BRANDSAFWAY INDUSTRIES, LLC;

SAFWAY GROUP HOLDING, LLC; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 ----oo0oo---- Defendants request to file under seal three employment- related agreements between the parties: (1) an Equity and Related Arrangements agreement, (2) a Management Incentive Compensation Plan, and (3) a Delegation of Authority agreement. (See Docket No. 43.) A party seeking to seal a judicial record bears the burden of overcoming a strong presumption in favor of public access. Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). The party must “articulate compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings that outweigh the general history of access and the public…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.