Hurtado
(PC) Adkins v. Hurtado
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DUPREE LAMONT ADKINS, Case No. 2:21-cv-00531-DJC-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED
DAVID HURTADO, et al., ECF No. 99 Defendants.
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS 17 Plaintiff brings this case alleging that defendant E. Marshak denied him access to the law library because of his race and defendant David Hurtado failed to act to remedy this violation despite having knowledge of it. ECF No. 41 at 6-10. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on these claims, ECF No. 99, plaintiff has filed an opposition, ECF No. 108, and defendants have filed a reply, ECF No. 111. I find, for the reasons stated below, that defendants’ motion should be granted, and judgment entered in their favor. A. Legal Standards Summary judgment is appropriate where there is “no genuine dispute as to any material fact…