Cardoza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIQUE HOLMES, Case No. 2:24-cv-02190-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE N. CARDOZA, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 On August 20, 2024, I ordered plaintiff to submit within thirty days either the required filing fee or a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 4. To date, plaintiff has not complied with that order. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissal of a case, for failure to comply with court orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 26 1 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the August 20, 2024 order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of…