(PC) Turner v. Vallejo City Mayor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20242:23-cv-02894California351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY R. TURNER, No. 2:23-cv-02894 KJM SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER VALLEJO CITY MAYOR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is currently detained at Napa State Hospital, filed this civil rights action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 26, 2024, the previously assigned1 magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff, and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed

1 Due to the appointment of a new magistrate judge to the Eastern District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.