Pierce

(PC) Murphy v. Pierce

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20242:21-cv-01789California960 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONRELL D. MURPHY, No. 2:21-cv-1789 TLN CSK P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS C. PIERCE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding without counsel with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons stated herein, this Court recommends that this action be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. The Court record reflects that on August 23, 2024, findings and recommendations served on plaintiff’s address of record (ECF No. 70) was returned by the United States Postal Service, marked undeliverable, paroled. On August 30, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to notify the court of his current address, and to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to defendants’ August 20, 2024 motion for leave to file a second motion for summary judgment, within twenty- one days. (ECF No. 72.) On September 12, 2024, plaintiff’s copy of the August 30, 2024 order was also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.