Sepulveda

Sepulveda v. Garcia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20242:23-cv-02177California2,115 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD SEPULVEDA, Case No. 2:23-cv-02177-DJC-JDP Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE GRANTED

SANDRA GARVIA, et al., ECF No. 10 Defendants.

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 17 Plaintiff brings this action against defendants Sandra Garcia (“Sandra”), Ernesto Artiaga (“Ernesto”), and Gabriela Artiaga (“Gabriela”), alleging that defendants violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189; California Health and Safety Code § 19955, et seq.; California’s Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 54, 54.1, and 54.3; and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). Defendants have not answered the complaint or otherwise appeared in this action. Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment on his ADA and Unruh Act claims, which was before me for hearing on June 6, 2024. ECF No. 10. For the 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.