Sepulveda

Sepulveda v. Gray

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20242:23-cv-02769California1,998 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD SEPULVEDA, Case No. 2:23-cv-02769-WBS-JDP Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE GRANTED

DANIEL SHERMAN GRAY, ECF No. 8 Defendant.

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 17 Plaintiff brings this action against defendant Daniel Gray, alleging defendant violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189; California Health and Safety Code § 19955, et seq.; California’s Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 54, 54.1, and 54.3; and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). Defendant has not answered the complaint or otherwise appeared. Plaintiff has filed a motion for default judgment on his ADA and Unruh Act claims, which was before me for a hearing on June 6, 2024. ECF No. 8. For the following reasons, I recommend that the motion be granted. 25

1 At the hearing plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.