Sepulveda
Sepulveda v. Gray
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD SEPULVEDA, Case No. 2:23-cv-02769-WBS-JDP Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE GRANTED
DANIEL SHERMAN GRAY, ECF No. 8 Defendant.
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS 17 Plaintiff brings this action against defendant Daniel Gray, alleging defendant violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189; California Health and Safety Code § 19955, et seq.; California’s Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 54, 54.1, and 54.3; and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). Defendant has not answered the complaint or otherwise appeared. Plaintiff has filed a motion for default judgment on his ADA and Unruh Act claims, which was before me for a hearing on June 6, 2024. ECF No. 8. For the following reasons, I recommend that the motion be granted. 25
1 At the hearing plaintiff’s…