Sherman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID W. WILSON, Case No.: 1:22-cv-0874 JLT SKO Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (Doc. 35) STUART SHERMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

16 Previously, the Court determined Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for a violation of his civil rights arising under the Eighth Amendment, but Plaintiff failed to state claims for violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Rehabilitation Act. Therefore, the Court ordered the action would proceed only on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim. (Doc. 30.) Plaintiff now moves for reconsideration of the Court’s order dismissing his other claims pursuant to Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 35.) I. Reconsideration Pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[o]n motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal…