Bubak

(PC) Shealy v. Bubak

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20242:24-cv-02310California359 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIZABETH MARIE SHEALY, No. 2:24-cv-2310 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

BUBAK, et al., Defendants. 16 By an order filed August 30, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis application on the proper form bearing her signature and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s order and has not filed the required document. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of her current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.