Bubak
(PC) Shealy v. Bubak
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIZABETH MARIE SHEALY, No. 2:24-cv-2310 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
BUBAK, et al., Defendants. 16 By an order filed August 30, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis application on the proper form bearing her signature and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s order and has not filed the required document. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of her current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 27 …