(PS) Halousek v. CA Public Employees' Retirement System
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SHEILA HALOUSEK, No. 2:23-cv-00839-KJM-CSK (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al., 14 Defendants.
16 On July 1, 2024, the magistrate judge issued an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice and granting plaintiff thirty (30) days to file an amended complaint. See ECF No. 19. The magistrate judge also recommended defendants’ motion to dismiss at ECF No. 11 be granted in part and denied in part. Id. This order and recommendation was served on the parties and contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On July 25, 2024, and after being granted additional time to object, see Min. Order, ECF No. 21, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations, see Obj.,ECF No. 22. Plaintiff then filed a first amended complaint as ordered by the magistrate judge. See First Am. Compl., ECF No. 23; Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). This…