Phillips

(HC) Stanger v. Phillips

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20241:24-cv-01223California470 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANA AARON STANGER, Case No. 1:24-cv-01223-EPG-HC

Petitioner, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE

SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE

v. EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN PHILLIPS,

Respondent.

16 Petitioner Dana Aaron Stanger is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. When a state prisoner files a habeas petition in a state that contains two or more federal judicial districts, the petition may be filed in either the judicial district in which the petitioner is presently confined or the judicial district in which he was convicted and sentenced. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 442 (2004) (quoting Carbo v. United States, 364 U.S. 611, 618, 81 S. Ct. 338, 5 L. Ed. 2d 329 (1961)). Petitions challenging the execution of a sentence are preferably heard in the district where the inmate is confined. See Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Petitions challenging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.