Residents

(PS) Littleton v. Residents

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20242:23-cv-00735California883 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL LITTLETON, Case No. 2:23-cv-00735-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT THIS MATTER BE DISMISSED RESIDENTS, OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

Defendant. 16 On March 15, 2024, I screened plaintiff’s complaint, notified him that it did not state a claim, and granted him thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint or otherwise to respond to the court order. Therefore, on April 30, 2024, I ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute. ECF No. 5. I notified plaintiff that if he wished to continue with this lawsuit, he must file an amended complaint. I also warned plaintiff that failure to comply with the April 30, 2024 order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. Plaintiff has not responded to the order to show cause,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.