Marez
Marez v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ARTHUR MAREZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-01063-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL
COMPANY, JURISDICTION IN THIS CASE
14 Defendant.
16 17 Plaintiff filed this employment discrimination case in August 2022, asserting Title VII and 18 state law claims. (ECF No. 1). In September 2023, Plaintiff amended the complaint to assert only 19 state law claims. (ECF No. 37). In September 2024, Plaintiff moved for leave to file a second 20 amended complaint, which motion, if granted, would add another state law claim but no Federal 21 claims. (ECF No. 51). 22 Upon review of the record, the Court will order Plaintiff to show cause why the Court not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction in this case. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a), a district court has “supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original…